Elizabeth
Sex: F
Individual Information
Birth:
Christening:
Death:
Burial:
Spouses and Children
1. *James Collins
Marriage:
Children:
1. Leonora Collins
Elizabeth
Sex: F
Individual Information
Birth:
Christening:
Death:
Burial:
Spouses and Children
1. *Thomas Salter
Marriage:
Children:
1. Elizabeth Salter
Elizabeth
Sex: F
Individual Information
Birth: 1842 - Sutton Cheney
Christening:
Death:
Burial:
Spouses and Children
1. *George Benn
Marriage:
Elizabeth
Sex: F
Individual Information
Birth: 1824 - Bradley, Bilston
Christening:
Death:
Burial:
Spouses and Children
1. *Enoch Shepherd
Marriage:
Children:
1. Sarah A Shepherd
2. Esther Shepherd
3. Reuben Shepherd
Elizabeth
Sex: F
Individual Information
Birth:
Christening:
Death:
Burial:
Spouses and Children
1. *James Meller
Marriage:
Children:
1. Rachel Meller
2. Frances Meller
3. Samuel Meller
4. Elizabeth Meller
5. James Meller
6. Emma Meller
7. William Meller
8. Edward Meller
Elizabeth
Sex: F
Individual Information
Birth: 1724 - Donington
Christening:
Death:
Burial:
Spouses and Children
1. *Thomas Jellicorse
Marriage: 1831 - Lichfield?
Children:
1. Ann Jellicorse
2. Sarah Jellicorse
3. Thomas Jellicorse
4. Elizabeth (Betty) Jellicorse
Notes
General:
could be Elizabeth Bishton m Thomas Jellicoe 2 Jun 1731 Lichfield Cathedral
dobs of children too early
Elizabeth
Sex: F
Individual Information
Birth:
Christening:
Death:
Burial:
Spouses and Children
1. *Robert Bishton
Marriage:
Children:
1. John Bishton
2. Robert Bishton
3. Samuel Bishton
4. Thomas Bishton
5. Mary Bishton
6. Joseph Bishton
Notes
Marriage Notes (Robert Bishton)
inferred as parents
Elizabeth
Sex: F
Individual Information
Birth: 1832 - Howbowdley, Much Wenlock
Christening:
Death:
Burial:
Spouses and Children
1. *Charles Bishton
Marriage:
Children:
1. Eliza Bishton
2. Hannah M Bishton
3. Edward Bishton
4. Charles Bishton
Notes
General:
1861: Trescott, Staffs. Charles 30 AgLab, w Elizabeth 29, Eliza 4, Hannah Marzia 7m
1871: Trescott, Staffs. Elizabeth Bishton 43 wid, Eliza 14, Hannah 10, Charles 7, Edward 4
1881: Trescott, Staffs. Elizabeth 56, Hannah 19, Charles 17, Edward 14
Elizabeth
Sex: F
Individual Information
Birth:
Christening:
Death:
Burial:
Spouses and Children
1. *Samuel Cotterill
Marriage:
Children:
1. Sarah Cotterill
2. Thomas Cotterill
3. George Cotterill
4. Samuel Cotterill
5. Elizabeth Cotterill
6. John Cotterill
7. William Cotterill
8. Ann Cotterill
9. Hannah Cotterill
10. Jane Cotterill
11. Mary Cotterill
Elizabeth (Betty)
Sex: F
Individual Information
Birth:
Christening:
Death:
Burial:
Spouses and Children
1. *Robert Bancroft
Marriage:
Children:
1. Eliza Bancroft
2. William Bancroft
3. Jonathan Bancroft
4. Jane Bancroft
5. Thomas Bancroft
Notes
General:
Thanks to Phil Molineux for this pointer:Research:
Removal Orders from Westerleigh
1820 Oct 6: Elizabeth Bancroft, wife of Robert, Eliza 17, William 12, Jonathan 8, Jane 4, Thomas 17m, to Box Wilts. (P/W/OP/5/131) NA page
National Archives (Bristol): "Westerleigh is an ancient church which up to 1886 was a chapelry annexed to the cure of Pucklechurch. On 3rd August 1886 by an Order-in-Council it was created "a district chapelry". See P/W/I/7 The records contain many poor law papers which have been listed in detail, with an index attached to this schedule."
Removal orders were used when people would otherwise become a burden on the parish under the Poor Laws. Destitute people had to be helped by being given Poor Relief.
To be eligible for relief, you had to be officially resident in the parish, i.e. born there, own property there, or be in possession of a certificate granting you resident status.
Without such a status, the Overseers of the Poor would do all they could in order not to have to pay up - so they would pay someone to take you back to where you came from, with an order from the court to their Overseers explaining that things were then their responsibility.
The original documents were generally a single page; a preprinted form in which the relevant names and dates were filled by hand. The orders were apparently very common.
In some cases the form gives a reason why the parish would be liable - a single woman being pregnant would be sent "home" because the parish would end up paying to support her over the birth and the child even after the girl was able to work again.
For a family the reason would probably be unemployment of the father, but ages of children might be given - very useful!
Sometimes you get a comment on the paper saying who accompanied the destitute people, when, and occasionally what his expenses were.